Category Archives: Angels

Devil Said Bang by Richard Kadrey

 

If you don’t know already, this is the fourth book in the Sandman Slim series and if you haven’t read the first 3 books yet (Sandman Slim, Kill the Dead, and Aloha From Hell) you really should and you should also be warned that there will be spoilers for those books here.

It seems that I’m following a pattern with these books. I loved the first one, thought the second one could have been a lot better, the third book was awesome, and this fourth book was alright, but something was lacking.

At the start of the book, Stark has been stuck in Hell playing Lucifer for over 3 months. He’s trying to help rebuild it, and he’s constantly at risk of being assassinated. He’s trying to find a way out of Hell, since his good half ran off with the Key. Snooping around Hell looking for answers takes a lot longer when you’re essentially a politican and always looking over your shoulder.

Sooo… basically, this book is about Stark trying to escape Hell and not be Lucifer anymore. Him being stuck in Hell sucked, because there were a bunch of different Hellions plotting stuff and it got a little confusing here and there, plus I missed Candy and all the other regular characters. He does get his hands on a scary new one-of-a-kind weapon, which is always fun. Sadly, Stark gets caught up in a couple “Oh I’m such a monster, I do such terrible things” crisis for a while, which was annoying cause his badassness and general “fuck-it” attitude are what makes these books so much fun. Much like the second book, it dragged a bit but then so much happened at the end that I’m really excited to see what the fifth book will be about. Unfortunately, I can’t really mention what happens near the end without mega spoilers, but this new plot twist definitely made the whole book worth reading. It totally appealed to my inner nerd.

I’m totally looking forward to the fifth book… there’s no title or date or anything like that yet on Kadrey’s website, but the book ended in a way that you know the series isn’t over.

 

Sarah Says: 3 stars

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under 3-star, Angels, Fantasy, Fiction, Paranormal

Aloha From Hell by Richard Kadrey

Aloha From Hell by Richard Kadrey

 

Whaaaat, you haven’t started this bad-ass series by Richard Kadrey yet? Why the hell not? If you haven’t you should read the first two books first, Sandman Slim and Kill the Dead. At the very least you could click on those links and see my reviews. And this here is the third book, Aloha From Hell. Be warned, there will be some spoilers if you haven’t read the other books.

So, after the events of the second book, Stark is being a good boy but going a little stir-crazy. He hasn’t killed anything in weeks, and he’s been too lethargic about finding out what Mason is up in in Hell. He also knows that Aelita is somewhere out there trying to take over Heaven, but he hasn’t done much about that either. No biggie though, because eventually a weird case of possession drags him back into the hellish world he’s kind of been trying to avoid.

This book was SO MUCH BETTER than Kill the Dead. Kill the Dead was one of those ”ehhhh” second-in-a-series books, that kind of sucks but is necessary because it sets up major events for the third book. It paid off, because this was pretty action-packed and I flew through it within 24 hours, and I read over 3/4 of it in one sitting. The whole plot with the God and Lucifer and Mason and Aelita and the Kissi is just nuts, and I was so happy to see Stark back in his element. I love him and his friends. I really like the developing relationship he has with Candy, a Jade who is scarily kick-ass but also a cute tiny girl. Even the writing was awesome in this one – I wrote down a lot of quotes and lines, such as…

“Sometimes just seeing a woman smile is like a knife in the heart. It hurts and it rattles your whole system, but against all your instincts you swallow the pain and keep looking. After a while you realize it doesn’t hurt as much as you thought it would.”

and

“Moo, motherfucker.”

Some great deep thoughts, as well as some hilarious one-liners. Gotta love it.

Anyways, the ending was totally MESSED UP and I’m so happy that there’s going to be a fourth book. This one was pretty hectic and mega-great, so I can only imagine how epic the next book is going to be. It’s going to be called Devil Said Bang and according to Kadrey’s website, it comes out August 28th of this year. Yay!

So you know, if you like demons and angels and humans who won’t die, you should totally read this series. Go pick up Sandman Slim now, and enjoy.

 

Sarah Says: 4 stars!

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under 4-star, Angels, Fantasy, Fiction, Paranormal

Review: Kill the Dead by Richard Kadrey

  • Title: Kill the Dead (Sandman Slim #2)
  • Author: Richard Kadrey
  • Publisher: Harper Voyager, 2010
  • Pages: 434
  • ISBN: 9780062017369

So, this is the sequel to Sandman Slim, which I read a couple of weeks ago. This book was… underwhelming.

So, after the events of the last book, Stark doesn’t really know what to do with himself. He’s doing work for both good and bad guys, mainly killing people who need killing. Then Lucifer comes into town and hires him to be his bodyguard, because he’s staying in L.A. to supervise a movie being made about himself. And then zombies start showing up all over the place. And Stark has to play detective to figure out what the hell is going on.

So, Lucifer in town AND zombie-action – must be exciting, right? Ehh. I felt like the book kind of dragged until I was more than halfway through it. Basically, I think Stark playing detective and trying to figure out who’s behind the zombie attacks was boring. I like seeing Stark in action, and I just didn’t really care who was releasing the zombies. And while I thought that Lucifer being in town would be the focus of the book, it wasn’t and that was disappointing.

However.  I still enjoy the witty, sarcastic asshole-ness that is Stark’s personality. And the book ended on a pretty good note. Action picked up near the end, Stark went back to his old killing-happy self, and I see now that the Lucifer plot set up the stage for the next novel really well. And even though this was lackluster, I have really high hopes for the third book, Aloha From Hell. I definitely think it’ll much more epic and action-packed.

Sarah Says: 2.5 stars

Leave a Comment

Filed under 3-star, Angels, Fantasy, Fiction, Paranormal, Zombies

To be or not to be… a supernatural creature.

So, recently reading and reviewing Perfect Fudge by Hazel M. Larsen (see previous post) has got me thinking about supernatural creatures, and the choices characters make in these books about whether or not to be one (if they even have the choice). Now, as a human I don’t want to live forever. I’m hoping to keel over when I’m a little over 70. But as a supernatural creature, it’d be so fun to be immortal. I know that’s not everyone’s cup of tea.

So, here are a bunch of supernatural / paranormal / fantastical beings I’ve read books or seen movies about.

Angels: I’m about to get a little spoiler-y here, because I want to clarify why the angels in Perfect Fudge (see previous post for review) are so cool and a fun concept. As you know if you read my review, it introduces a unique concept of guardian angels. These guardian angels don’t really have any biblical connotations, but they help people. They can also fly, teleport, turn invisible, cook food with their mind, heal, clean with the blink of an eye, and whether they start out older or younger, they’ll eventually and then forever appear to be in their 20′s. Of course this is a kind of new version of the idea of angels, but I think it’s awesome.

*I would totally choose to be an angel. There’s almost zero downside.

Vampires: Of course the paranormal lore is different according to legends / authors / movies, but most agree that vampires drink blood (human or animal in most cases), have super speed and strength, and are burned by sunlight. I think the slight majority opinion is that vampires can hold on to their humanity if they choose – at least Christopher Moore, Anne Rice, Charlaine Harris, and Stephanie Meyer think so. (I probably just discredited this theory a bit by mentioning Meyer, but hey whatever). I personally agree with this – I think vampires can choose how humane they want to be. I don’t believe that vampires are “damned”, but that has more to do with the fact that I don’t believe in heaven or hell, so how could I believe in damnation? And even if someone showed me proof that all that existed and your soul could be damned… well I don’t know if that would convince me not to be a vampire.

*If a vampire walked up to me tonight and offered to make me a vamp… I would definitely want to say yes. Honestly, the only thing holding me back here is that the honeyman said that if I was a vampire, he’d have to try to kill me. And you know, that kind of means breaking up, and I don’t want that, I love my honeyman. Honestly, angels can do more cool shit than vampires, but for some reason the idea of being a vampire is more appealing to me… it’s probably just more familiar of an idea.

Werewolves: Again, the lore is really different here. Some say that werewolves only change during a full moon and have no control during that time. Some say that weres that change whenever they want and are conscious the whole time. Most agree that you transform into a big huge scary wolf-like creature (unless you’re the director of the 3rd Harry Potter movie, in which you think weres transform into some weird, sad hairy mandog-looking creature). Generally though, werewolves are bad-ass and powerful and scary-looking.

 *Whether or not I agree to be a were would depend on the lore we’re going with here. I personally choose to think that weres are like the ones on True Blood – that they can change at will and know what they’re doing when they’re in that form. And if that were the case then hell yes I’d be a werewolf.

Witch / wizard: Okay, does this one even need much explaining? The term witch general means one who can do magic – cast spells, has powers, etc. They’re usually not immortal. My personal favorite? The Charmed witches. I love Piper. Oh and Harry Potter of course, can’t forget him.

*I’d agree to be a witch in a heartbeat.

Elves: Elves are cool fantastical creatures. They’re usually nature-nuts, proud, arrogant, secretive, and skinny. But they’re also powerful, graceful, and have magical abilities. In most fantasy, elves are not to be trifled with.

* I suppose that yes, I’d agree to be an elf. Even if meant me getting all weird and slender looking.

Fairies: I think that sometimes the lines between fairies and elves blend and are kind of together called “fae” creatures. I usually think of fairies as little pixies – tiny winged creatures with magical abilities, like Tinkerbell. Gotta love Tink.

* I don’t think I’d agree to be a fairy… depends on the scope of magical abilities. But I think I’d feel too vulnerable being that tiny, and the biggest appeal of being a supernatural creature is being able to feel like the shit and be powerful and stuff.

Mutants: Now here’s a fun one. I’ll let in on a little secret… I believe almost any of these paranormal creatures could exist. Who the hell am I to say that they don’t just because I’ve never had the luck to meet one? I know, I know, I’m like a big kid. Anyways, I like the idea of mutants because to me they are the most likely supernatural creatures to exist. Well, actually they’re still technically humans. They’re not magic, they’re just evolutionally-advanced humans. But still, I’m counting em. Think of the X-Men, the X-Men are awesome! Sure, some of them have pretty lame mutations, but most of them are cool and useful in some way (after all, the point of nature evolving like this would be the progression of human life).

* Sign me up! I know I’m 24, but I’m still hoping some sign of cool mutant abilities will show… or maybe I’ll just go the Alex Mac route and get cool mutant-like powers from radiation and chemicals :-) It’s either mutant powers or cancer… 50/50 odds aren’t too bad, right?

Zombies: Okay, who the hell would want to be a zombie? I’m including them on the list because they are a really popular paranormal creature these days, but they’re basically rotting humans that can’t think anything other than “BRAAAIIIINSS”.

* Hell no, I wouldn’t be a zombie. But I can’t wait for the zombie apocalypse so I can be a zombie-killer! I’ll judge anyone who actually says they’d choose to be a zombie. Weirdo.

Unicorns / Dragons: These are two of the most popular paranormal animals really. Unicorns are supposed to be all sweet and crazy magical, and dragons are supposed to be all nasty and fire-breathing. Honestly, I think both are really cool but I don’t think I’d ever choose to turn into one. I’d feel like a magical pet.

Giants / Goblins / Leprechauns: So these don’t need much explaining. Giants are huge, goblins are tiny and mean, and leprechauns are tiny and lucky. I think I’d reject all of these just on basis of size. 

 Gods: Well, gods are pretty self-explanatory too. I’m thinking of two sets of gods in particular – the Greek mythology gods, and the gods and godlings in the Inheritance Trilogy by N.K. Jemisin. Either way, all are bad-ass. I love that gods are such all-powerful beings, but that they’re also usually petty just like humans. I don’t know why humanity ever gave up on Greek gods as a religion, I probably would have been a believer.

*I would totally be a god. You practically can’t be killed, and you are the baddest mofo out there. Seriously as powerful as all hell. For someone whose severe lack of ambition means I want to be a housewife, I’m surprisingly power-hungry when it comes to paranormal creatures.

I think that covers most of the supernatural creatures I’ve been thinking of…

Oh, and for funsies here are some of my favorite books / movies relating the all of the above:

  • Perfect Fudge by Hazel M. Larsen (angels)
  • Sookie Stackhouse series by Charlaine Harris (vampires, werewolves)
  • Inheritance trilogy by N.K. Jemisin (gods, godlings)
  • Bloodsucking Fiends /You SuckBite Me by Christopher Moore
  • Interview With A Vampire by Anne Rice
  • X-Men movies
  • Outlander series by Diana Gabaldon (time-travellers, not mentioned)
  • Living With the Dead series by Jesse Petersen (zombies)
  • Inheritance Cycle by Christopher Paolini (dragons, elves, fae)
  • Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling (witches, wizards, unicorn)
  • The Kingkiller Chronicles by Patrick Rothfuss (wizards, fae)
  • True Blood tv show (vampires, werewolves, fairies, fae)
  • Charmed tv show (witches, leprechauns, giants, fairies, vampires)

So, whatcha think?

If one of these creatures walked up to you and offered to make you one of them, would you do it? Which one would you want to be the most? Any that I missed that you’d choose to be? Or would you go the crazy route and refuse them all and choose to remain human?

 ~Sarah

3 Comments

Filed under Angels, Fairy-tales, Fantasy, Fiction, Harry Potter, Outlander series, Random, Sci-Fi, Vampires, Zombies

Perfect Fudge by Hazel M. Larsen

It was only about a month ago that Jenn from Booksessed sent me an email, gushing about this amazing book she had read by self-published author Hazel M. Larsen. I could really feel Jenn’s enthusiasm, and about two weeks ago I finally ordered it from Amazon. I got it in the mail Monday or Tuesday, and I’ve already read it :-)

Sam is a young girl who one day witnesses a crime and therefore becomes a target herself. When she wakes up, she realizes she’s been kidnapped – although they use the term rescued. But they won’t let her go and insists that she now has to live with them – forever. They say they’re guardian angels, and they want her to join them. But even as she starts to feel comfortable with them, she can’t ignore the feeling that she has to get away.

So, I did thoroughly enjoy this book, and I think that it’s a great debut. I love the idea of guardian angels that Larsen created – it’s fresh and unique and different. Some of my favorite parts of the book were seeing the powers that the angels had, and seeing them interact with each other. I loved the romance that developed between Sam and Dexter – it crept on you, and was definitely not insta-love. Dexter is just awesome. The whole cast was pretty great – angels Dexter, Linus, Percy, human Millie, and even the creeps like Aidan, Rob, Crystal, and Simon were all interesting and different. This was an easy book to fly through. Oh and another thing I really liked – Larsen did a fantastic job at making her angels seem ageless. And that made the whole book overall seem less like a YA novel to me, and more fantasy fiction (which I love).

Now, for my  nit-pickyness (yup that’s a word). Sam was a frustrating girl in the beginning of the book, and it took a while for me to like her. She just didn’t react to being kidnapped the way I think someone who normally act. I think this could have been helped with a little more backstory - we don’t learn a whole lot about Sam from before she was taken, and I think some background info could have made her behavior later seem a little clearer. I was also upset about how she handled things with Aidan about halfway through the book. Anyways, eventually Sam really grew on me and by the end of the book I was definitely cheering her on and happy for her.

Overall, this was a great book. I really kind of became attached to the angels. Jenn does a Q&A with Hazel Larsen on her blog, and I’m happy to hear that more of Larsen’s work will be about angels. She has said that this book won’t be part of a series, but personally, I would love it if she re-visited these characters. I want to see more of Dexter, Sam, Linus, and Millie in particular. I want to see what angels really do when they’re in action!

Anyways, I definitely recommend giving this book a try. It’s a new, unique premise and it was a refreshing read. I’m very happy I bought it :) I can’t wait to see what Hazel Larsen comes out with next!

Sarah Says: 4 stars

2 Comments

Filed under 4-star, Angels, Fantasy, Fiction, Romance, YA

>The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis

>

OK, let me say that this was entertaining, and I never found it dull. If you’re looking for something engaging and mildly intellectual, this might be a good pick for you. Now be forewarned that I am an atheist (or at the very least, I really don’t like organized religion) and that assuredly biases my view on the book. Just as I’m sure a Christian reading it would be biased. I honestly don’t know how you couldn’t be biased when reading something like this, but anyways…

C.S. Lewis writes as Screwtape, an accomplished demon / devil who writes advice-filled letters to his nephew Wormwood, a new “tempter” who is try to damn a young man.

If you’re a Christian or even just mildly religious, you might feel that this is an eye-opening account of how evil really works and how much you have to be alert for all the ways in which you might be tempted. Which I’m sure is EXACTLY what C.S. Lewis wants you to feel. For me, it’s him (Lewis) blaming every little thing that men think, say, or do on temptation from demons. Have you ever seen the movie The Waterboy? You know his mama that says that everything is “the devil”? That’s pretty much C.S. Lewis here.

He implies that well-educated skeptics are on their way to Hell. He implies aethists are on their way to hell. He implies that the devil is what makes men want to work for things like social justice. He implies that trying to be unselfish is the devil’s work. He implies that it’s the devil’s fault that women are less likely to marry and have children. Seriously, if there’s something a human does, the devil is probably to blame. He removes all human accountability for their actions, and lays all the blame on the devil’s work- therefore trying to make you really paranoid that every little want, desire, or thought you have MIGHT be the devil at work and you should take caution.

Also, it’s interesting that in Lewis’s Hell, demons actually have records offices, demons-in-training, and intelligence-gathering offices. It was fun to picture Hell as an office-type setting. That might be the one thing that he got right.

3 stars

~Sarah

2 Comments

Filed under 3-star, Angels, Classics, Fiction

The Gargoyle by Andrew Davidson

>The Gargoyle book cover

Yes, yes – I FINALLY read this book. People have been talking about it for ages, I feel like I’m the last one to read it! But I just finished it this morning, and despite the risk that people will come after me with pitchforks… I didn’t love it. I didn’t hate it, but I didn’t love it.

Okay, so here’s the basic premise – unnamed cocaine-addicted pornographer crashes and gets severely burned, but lives. In the hospital, he meets crazy-lady Marianne Engel, who claims that he and her were lovers in the 1300′s, and she tells him stories and overall helps him to heal.

In the beginning, I was really put off by the narrator’s blunt and kind of vulgar descriptions of his pre-crash life. It really seemed like the author was trying to shock me into continuing to read, and by page 50 this was really starting to get annoying and I almost quit. But then Marianne comes in and the book got a whole lot better from there.

I loved the stories that Marianne told, both of her past life and her random love tales spread throughout. I wish I could just buy a copy of the love tales, because they were great. Marianne’s story of her past life and how she met the unnamed narrator was really entrancing, and I appreciated that the narrator did research to try to confirm or deny what she told him.

Now, here’s my main issues with the book… some slight spoilers ahead….

I just wasn’t feeling the love between Marianne and our crispy narrator. And I find it hard to believe that he went from super-jerk to kind-hearted that quickly. There didn’t seem to be much transition, and there didn’t seem to be a real reason that he would’ve fallen in love with Marianne. She was pretty and told cool stories, but I don’t know… just didn’t seem believable. Also, they never really explained how she found him and knew he was her ex-lover, and didn’t explain what the hell she had been doing for 700 years if her story was true (which it seems like we’re supposed to believe it is).

Anywho, I liked Marianne and the side stories were cool – it was really the narrator that kept me from loving this book. Honestly, I don’t get what all the fuss is about.

3 stars

~Sarah

1 Comment

Filed under 3-star, Angels, Contemp. Lit, Fiction