Tag Archives: Charlotte Bronte

Top Ten Tuesday: Authors I’d Have At My Thanksgiving Dinner

Good morning guys and gals (mostly gals), it’s Tuesday! Yay! I’m excited because my sis and baby nephew are spending the night tonight, but it’s also an exciting day because it’s time for Top Ten Tuesday, hosted by The Broke and The Bookish. This week’s topic is Top Ten Authors I Want at My Thanksgiving Dinner.

 

 

1. Christopher Moore – Because he wrote Lamb, and A Dirty Job, and so many other novels that make me laugh my ass off. And I am thankful for those. And I am sure he would be hysterical in person as well.

 

2. Diana Gabaldon - Because I will forever be grateful that she brought the Outlander series into the world. And so I can hound her for information about future books.

 

 

3. N.K. Jemisin - I loooooove her Inheritance trilogy (AKA The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms  / 100K trilogy). And I think she would be fun and snarky and interesting. And I think she’d be fun to get into political / social discussions with.

 

4. Matthew Norman – I REALLY enjoyed Domestic Violets. However, there were a couple of things I didn’t like about it, so I’d like to invite him so that I can hound him about any other novels he has in progress and make sure he doesn’t make the same mistakes. (I’m so rude.) Also, he seems pro-Obama in the book. Yay!

 

5. Emily Bronte – Because I love Wuthering Heights, and so I can quiz her about the rest of her family. I really wanna know if Charlotte Bronte was the crazy super-bitch I suspect she was.

 

 

6. George R.R. Martin – Because I want to ask him how in the bloody hell he keeps track of the HUGE number of characters and crazy plots in the A Song of Fire and Ice series. Which I love for it’s epicness.

7. Libba Bray – Okay, actually before I meet Libba I need to read more of her books, because I’ve only read Beauty Queens and thought it was AWESOME. And she seems like the kind of weird person I’d get along with. Plus, look at her glasses! I would try to steal her glasses, those are cute. And to ask her if she goes by “Libba” because that way, her name kinda looks like “library”. Yes, these are the thoughts that I think.

 

8. Patrick Rothfuss - Because he’s PATRICK F-IN ROTHFUSS. I need insider info on the rest of the Kingkiller Chronicles! And he has to being baby Oot with him to dinner – normally I wouldn’t allow children, but his blog posts about his son are just so cute.

 

9. Paullina Simons – Ya’ll know how much I love The Bronze Horseman and Tatiana & Alexander. But the last book in the trilogy, The Summer Garden, was AWFUL. And I need to beg her to re-write it. I realize that’s a crappy reason, but it’s that serious.

 

10. Jane Austen – Because the invite list wouldn’t be complete without her! I have so many questions for her – like which of her novels was her favorite, and how does she feel about the Brontes, and what does she think of the skanky-ness and general impropriety of this generation?

 And of course I’d hit up each of these authors for their autographs in my copies of their books, because ya know… I’d HAVE to.

And there are a bunch of other authors I’d want to include – Jesse Petersen, Philippa Gregory, Mercedes Lackey, Anne Bronte, and yeah, it wouldn’t be just a “dinner”, it’d be a damn banquet!

Okay folks, that’s all I got. What are your author picks? OH, and go vote in my December poll on the right-hand side!

~Sarah

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 Comments

Filed under Top Ten Tuesday

>Jane Eyre

>Jane Eyre book review, Charlotte Bronte
Well, I think it’s official; Charlotte Bronte is my least favorite Bronte sister. I much prefer Anne’s style of writing, and I much prefer Emily’s characters and storylines.

Jane Eyre seemed realllllly drawn out. I was bored through the majority of it. For about the first hundred pages, I was okay – the writing seemed solid, and I was enjoying it. But by the end of the book I really couldn’t wait to be done.

In the beginning, Jane Eyre seemed like she’d be so much more of a fun character; as a child she was a lot more passionate and indignant. Then she grows up into a wussy lady; she lets her employers walk all over her, talk down to her, and she’s okay with it. She rarely lets her emotions get the best of her (making her seem frigid and emotionless), and she’s constantly lecturing herself – it got really tiresome. She seemed to want to do the right thing though, so she gets points for that.

As for Edward Rochester… I just don’t get it. He was kind of a jerk. He really just seemed to use Jane as a sounding board for when he felt talking; he usually just talked at her instead of with her. (And, she made a great doormat and put up with it). Now, I did feel bad for him – he had some crap luck early in life, and that sucks. But there’s no real reason for his arrogance and self-centeredness.

The whole “mystery” aspect of the story was enjoyable – probably the only thing that kept me reading on.

Maybe I’ll try this again like 20 years down the road and have a change of heart, but as for now I just wasn’t that impressed.

2 stars

~Sarah

2 Comments

Filed under 2-star, British, Classics, Fiction